Friday, December 04, 2009

Biblioblog Top 50 update

Earlier this week I mentioned the monthly Biblioblog Top 50. Apparently, however, it will only be updated twice a year from now on. A new top 50 list was just published based on visits from June-November. Now this blog is ranked #18.

7 Comments:

Peter M. Head said...

Do we care?

Peter M. Head said...

BoW

Jim said...

of course you do or you wouldn't have mentioned that you don't care. if you REALLY didn't care, you would never even notice it or mention it. in the same way that i don't care about rugby and so i never mention it at all.

Tommy Wasserman said...

On the one hand, I know both Peter and I appreciate very much that we have interested readers (especially readers active in textual criticism), as reflected in the comments, in these kind of statistics, and in other ways.

On the other hand, we both probably don't like to compete (unless it is in racewalking or powerpoint presentations - I admit that I don't have a chance there).

Tommy Wasserman said...

I should also add that I personally think it is good to "connect" with the other biblioblogs (that is why I added a biblioblogroll), in much the same way as gathering physically for conferences. It is good that the biblioblogs interact with and refer to each other in various positive ways.

Peter M. Head said...

Tommy,
You are usually so earnest, except when teasing me.

Peter M. Head said...

I am in end of term Friday.